In his two-hour speech in parliament defending the proposed ministerial salary hike, Singapore prime minister Lee Hsien Loong justified the move by saying that "I'm worried about somebody wanting to be Prime Minister, hoping to be paid not a single cent but still collect $400 million — under the table..."
This is a flawed argument. First, it is precisely to prevent a rogue prime minister from taking office that we need to have checks and balances in the government. Right now this is non-existent, which explains why Lee Hsien Loong can get away with whatever he proposes.
Secondly, using the example cited by Lee, what is the difference if the said prime minister is paid S$400 million legally but collects nothing under the table? And even if the said prime minister is paid S$400 million, is there any guarantee that this will stop him from attempting to collect more under the table? Greed has no limit, you know.
In my last post, I forgot to document this statement by Lee explaining why he is donating his salary increases rather than forfeit them in the first place: "The government will pay me my full salary because that is how the system will have to work..."
This either shows a lack of flexibility (typical textbook-style thinking - that's the system so that's how it must work) or a lack of initiative to evaluate the merits of an established system. Or perhaps both.
In any case, it clearly demonstrates a lack of leadership on the part of Lee. And we're paying him in excess of S$2.5 million this year and S$3 million (or the equivalent of 5 peanuts) by the end of 2008?
Ministers salaries - lets have a re-focus
World-class pay = world-class performance?
Technorati Tags: Lee Hsien Loong ministerial pay checks and balances greed
What Would Walt Do?
Check out this 148 page e-book written by D. M. Miller, a project manager during the construction of Walt Disney World from 1968 to 1971. It chronicles the experiences of the young Florida engineer, whose team as responsible for the quality control of all construction materials and methods on the project. In the book, Miller suggests that Walt Disney World may be the highest quality construction project ever built.
Jeremy Gutsche, Chief Trend Hunter of TrendHunter.com , may not have been the first to write about the dynamics of the current economic turm...
To Catch A Tartar: A Dissident In Lee Kuan Yew’s Prison is an excellent study of the conceit and deceit of a man many Singaporeans thought t...
No amount of PAP harassment is going to stop people from sharing information and asking questions. I have saved Alex Au's blog posts as ...
Notwithstanding FORTUNE magazine's portrayal of him as a futurist ("The smartest (or the nuttiest) futurist on Earth", May 14...
This half-page ad by Lane Crawford suffers from poor execution with amateurish use of font and font effects (oh wait, maybe they did it del...