It was reported that Singapore prime minister Lee Hsien Loong will donate his pay increment of S$600,000 a year for the next five years to charity after Singaporeans became outraged by the recent ministerial pay hike. So does that make Lee Hsien Loong a modern day Robin Hood?
No. Unlike the real Robin Hood who robbed the rich to give to the poor, Lee Hsien Loong and his cronies in parliament are robbing everyone and returning only part of the loot to a selected group of poor people.
I'm not a mathematician, but someone calculated that this self-serving, unsustainable and illogical salary benchmarking exercise will cost Singaporean taxpayers $214 million, or about $50 per capita. This is absurd, because it means that Singaporean taxpayers are being forced to fund Lee Hsien Loong's "charitable" donations.
Lee Hsien Loong says that his donation will give him the moral high ground to defend the move to raise the salaries of his fellow ministers. First, you don't suddenly become moral by giving away money you obtained immorally. And least of all, you shouldn't have done it after the fact - it's akin to getting caught stealing and saying you'll return the stolen goods.
Secondly, this "act" of giving is meaningless if the other ministers continue to hold on to their salary increases. Oh, by the way, is Lee Hsien Loong implying that the other ministers are on less moral ground to defend their own increases if they don't follow suit?
Finally, did anyone question whether Lee Hsien Loong's donations will be tax-deductible? Maybe that's his creative way of avoiding taxes, if he's taxed at all.
Compared to what Lee Hsien Loong and his father have done to boost their own fortunes, Halliburton looked like a mom-and-pop operation.
I am sure some useless minister with a sissy name from the PAP (yes, I'm referring to you, Vivian) will come out and urge Singaporeans to get on with their lives. But before these assholes spout nonsense again, may I remind them that to say "move on" without dealing with the consequences is the rudest form of political expediency.
Singapore's 'fat cat' ministers to get fatter
Did you know - Ministers on pension scheme
Does Singapore have a clean government?
Go, Chok Tong
Technorati Tags: Lee Hsien Loong ministerial pay salary benchmarking Singaporean taxpayers donation
What Would Walt Do?
Check out this 148 page e-book written by D. M. Miller, a project manager during the construction of Walt Disney World from 1968 to 1971. It chronicles the experiences of the young Florida engineer, whose team as responsible for the quality control of all construction materials and methods on the project. In the book, Miller suggests that Walt Disney World may be the highest quality construction project ever built.
To Catch A Tartar: A Dissident In Lee Kuan Yew’s Prison is an excellent study of the conceit and deceit of a man many Singaporeans thought t...
How many ways do you know to say "take a dump"? Here are a few suggestions: Baking a cake Squeezin chocolate Blowing mud Drowni...
Notwithstanding FORTUNE magazine's portrayal of him as a futurist ("The smartest (or the nuttiest) futurist on Earth", May 14...
Oct 1994 : In connection with a commentary he wrote in the International Herald Tribune stating how judiciaries in some Asian countries are ...
This half-page ad by Lane Crawford suffers from poor execution with amateurish use of font and font effects (oh wait, maybe they did it del...